C1&C2 EOI Module 5: Mediation. Tips

EOI EXAM: MEDIATION

Topic: Social Problems and Inequality Test Objective: To assess the candidate's ability to transfer information from a source to a recipient, adapting the register, tone, and format to the specific context.

1. General Instructions

1. Duration: 30 minutes per task (C1 or C2).

2. Source: Read the Source Text and the task brief defining the Target Audience, the objective, and the required format.

3. Mediation: Transfer the key ideas from the source text. Do not provide a personal opinion.

4. Word Count: STRICTLY 70 words maximum for the final production.

   
   

2. Mediation Tips (C1 and C2)

Aspect	C1 Level (Fluency and Effectiveness)	C2 Level (Mastery and Precision)
Analysis	Identify the main idea and the relationship with the recipient.	Identify nuances and the purpose for concise transfer.
Register	Adapt register (formal/informal) and use clear connectors.	Use advanced vocabulary and complex but efficient syntax.
Structure	Use a clear opening/closing adapted to the format.	Ensure total cohesion despite the extreme word limit.
Lexis	Use specific vocabulary (e.g., poverty line, marginalized, gap).	Use advanced collocations (e.g., systemic disparity, social mobility).

C1 MEDIATION TASK (Source Text)

Source Text Extract: "The Invisible Wall: Understanding Modern Poverty"

"Poverty in developed nations is often hidden but deeply damaging. It isn't just about a lack of money; it's about 'social exclusion.' When people can't afford a stable internet connection or basic transport, they are cut off from job opportunities and education. This creates a cycle that is incredibly hard to break. Community-led initiatives, such as 'digital hubs' and local mentoring, are proving more effective than top-down government aid. The goal is to move from temporary relief to empowering people with the tools they need to participate fully in society again. Small, local actions can bridge the gap that larger policies often miss."

✅ C1 MEDIATION: COMPLETED EMAIL (70 WORDS MAX)

Subject: Understanding modern social exclusion

Hi [Friend's Name],

I’ve been reading about how modern poverty is actually "social exclusion." It’s more than just money; a lack of internet or transport cuts people off from opportunities. Interestingly, the article suggests that local community projects, like mentoring, work better than government aid. They focus on empowering people rather than just giving temporary relief. It’s a great way to bridge the gap and break the cycle!

Best, [Your Name]

C2 MEDIATION TASK (Source Text)

Source Text Fragment: "The Meritocracy Myth and Systemic Stratification"

"The prevailing narrative of meritocracy often obscures the systemic disparities that dictate life outcomes. While individual effort is laudable, it cannot fully compensate for the 'zip-code effect'—the reality that place of birth remains the strongest predictor of economic success. This entrenched inequality is not merely a moral failure but a significant drag on national productivity, as vast pools of talent remain untapped. Addressing this requires a paradigm shift: moving away from equality of opportunity toward 'equity of outcomes.' This involves targeted investment in marginalized infrastructures and the dismantling of unconscious biases in recruitment. Only by addressing these structural foundations can we foster true social mobility and economic resilience."

✅ C2 MEDIATION: COMPLETED BRIEFING NOTE (70 WORDS MAX)

To: Policy Committee Subject: Strategy: Addressing Systemic Stratification and Productivity

The analysis contends that systemic disparities, particularly the "zip-code effect," hinder national productivity by stifling untapped talent. To foster true social mobility, we must shift our focus toward "equity of outcomes." This necessitates targeted investment in marginalized infrastructures and dismantling recruitment biases. By addressing these structural foundations, we can mitigate entrenched inequality and ensure long-term economic resilience, moving beyond the flawed narrative of pure meritocracy.