C1&C2 EOI Module 9: Mediation. Tips
- WEBCI Online English material

- 10 hours ago
- 3 min read
EOI EXAM: MEDIATION
Topic: Vintage & Modernity
Test Objective: To assess the candidate's ability to transfer information from a source to a recipient, adapting the register, tone, and format to the specific context.
1. General Instructions
Duration: 30 minutes per task (C1 or C2).
Source: Read the Source Text and the task brief defining the Target Audience, the objective, and the required format.
Mediation: Transfer the key ideas from the source text. Do not provide a personal opinion.
Word Count: STRICTLY 70 words maximum for the final production.
2. Mediation Tips (C1 and C2)
Aspect | C1 Level (Fluency and Effectiveness) | C2 Level (Mastery and Precision) |
Analysis | Identify the main idea and the relationship with the recipient. | Identify nuances and the purpose for concise transfer. |
Register | Adapt register (formal/informal) and use clear connectors. | Use advanced vocabulary and complex but efficient syntax. |
Structure | Use a clear opening/closing adapted to the format. | Ensure total cohesion despite the extreme word limit. |
Lexis | Use specific vocabulary (e.g., nostalgia, trendy, timeless). | Use advanced collocations (e.g., aesthetic revival, contemporary utility). |
C1 MEDIATION TASK (Source Text)
Source Text Extract: "The New Old: Why We Are Obsessed with the Past"
"From vinyl records to film cameras, 'vintage' is no longer just for collectors; it’s a mainstream lifestyle. This trend is a reaction to our hyper-digital world. People are seeking 'tactile experiences'—something they can touch and feel in an age of invisible data. However, the article notes that we don't actually want to live in the past. We want 'Modern Vintage': the look of the 70s but with the convenience of Bluetooth. This fusion allows us to enjoy the aesthetic warmth of the past without sacrificing the efficiency of modern technology. It's about finding a balance between soul and speed."
✅ C1 MEDIATION: COMPLETED EMAIL (70 WORDS MAX)
Subject: Why is everything "vintage" lately?
Hi [Friend's Name],
I read that the vintage trend is a reaction against our digital world. People crave "tactile experiences" they can actually touch. However, the goal isn't to live in the past, but to embrace "Modern Vintage." We want the old-school aesthetic combined with modern convenience, like Bluetooth. It’s the perfect balance: enjoying the warmth of the past without losing today's efficiency. Pretty cool, right?
Best,
[Your Name]
C2 MEDIATION TASK (Source Text)
Source Text Fragment: "Anachronistic Consumption: The Dialectics of Nostalgia"
"The resurgence of vintage aesthetics in contemporary design represents a profound 'nostalgic turn' that complicates the linear narrative of progress. In an era of planned obsolescence, vintage objects are reimagined as symbols of durability and authenticity. Yet, this is often a 'commodified nostalgia' where the past is sanitized for modern consumption. The challenge for today's industries is to move beyond mere mimicry. True innovation lies in 'synthetic modernity'—integrating the artisanal values of yesteryear with sustainable, cutting-edge materials. This creates a product that satisfies the human desire for historical continuity while addressing the urgent environmental demands of the 21st century. It is a strategic synthesis of heritage and high-tech."
✅ C2 MEDIATION: COMPLETED BRIEFING NOTE (70 WORDS MAX)
To: Design Strategy Group
Subject: Analysis: Synthetic Modernity and Aesthetic Revival
The analysis explores the "nostalgic turn," where vintage objects symbolize authenticity against planned obsolescence. To remain competitive, we must move beyond mimicry toward "synthetic modernity." This involves integrating artisanal heritage with sustainable, cutting-edge materials. This strategic synthesis satisfies the consumer's desire for historical continuity while addressing contemporary environmental demands. We must leverage this fusion to create products that offer both emotional durability and 21st-century utility.

Comments